|
odishageography.com |
Human development is the process of enlarging people’s choices — to lead a long and healthy life, to be educated, and to enjoy a decent standard of living. The idea, developed by economist Mahbub ul Haq and Nobel laureate Amartya Sen, was made measurable through the Human Development Index (HDI) in the first UNDP Human Development Report (1990). The HDI combines three dimensions — health (life expectancy at birth), education (mean and expected years of schooling) and income (per capita income) — into a single value between 0 and 1.
Odisha’s human development story is one of the most striking turnarounds among Indian states. In the early 1990s it was among the poorest states in India: its HDI was about 0.40, more than half its people lived below the poverty line, and its infant and maternal mortality rates were among the highest in the country. Three decades later, Odisha has:
Yet Odisha still sits in the lower part of India’s HDI ranking. Persistent challenges include high infant and maternal mortality, child undernutrition and anaemia, low higher-education enrolment, and a deep regional divide between the developed coastal and mining districts and the tribal-dominated south and west, especially the KBK (Kalahandi–Balangir–Koraput) region. Understanding this mix of progress and gaps is central to the geography of development in Odisha.
Table of Contents
Odisha (then Orissa) was among the first Indian states to publish its own human development report. The Orissa Human Development Report 2004, prepared by the Planning and Coordination Department with UNDP support, estimated the state’s HDI at 0.579 — the state’s HDI having risen about 51% between 1981 and 2001, though Odisha remained the fifth-lowest among major states. It also put the Gender Development Index (GDI) at 0.539.
The report calculated HDI for all 30 districts and revealed a sharp spatial divide:
| Rank | Highest-HDI districts | HDI | Lowest-HDI districts | HDI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Khurda | 0.736 | Malkangiri | 0.370 |
| 2 | Jharsuguda | 0.722 | Kandhamal | 0.389 |
| 3 | Cuttack | 0.695 | Gajapati | 0.431 |
| 4 | Sundargarh | 0.683 | Koraput | 0.431 |
| 5 | Angul | 0.663 | Nabarangpur | 0.436 |
The most developed districts are urban–industrial (Khurda with Bhubaneswar, Cuttack) or mining–industrial (Jharsuguda, Sundargarh, Angul). The least developed form one contiguous belt in the south and south-west, in the Eastern Ghats, where Scheduled Tribes form a large share of the population. The HDI of Khurda was about twice that of Malkangiri.
The Global Data Lab (Radboud University) estimates subnational HDI for Indian states using UNDP methodology. Its series shows Odisha’s HDI rising steadily from 0.403 in 1990 to 0.451 in 2000, 0.527 in 2010, 0.578 in 2015 and 0.614 in 2020, before dipping to 0.598 in 2021 with the COVID-19 pandemic and recovering to 0.610 in 2022. Throughout, Odisha has stayed below the all-India HDI (0.644 in 2022), but the gap has narrowed slightly in relative terms.
In Global Data Lab’s latest (2023) release, Odisha’s HDI is 0.648 against India’s 0.685, placing Odisha 34th of 36 states and union territories — ahead of only Jharkhand and Bihar, and level with Uttar Pradesh. This places Odisha in the medium human development category.
A 2026 study by the National Institute of Public Finance and Policy (NIPFP) on HDI of Indian states for 2022–23 likewise groups Odisha among the states below the national average, with Assam, Rajasthan and West Bengal, and notes that Odisha’s HDI scores resemble those of countries such as Kenya, Ghana and Namibia.

Odisha’s HDI has tracked India’s closely in shape, but a consistent gap of roughly 0.03–0.05 points has remained. The fastest gains came after the mid-2000s, when improvements in schooling, a sharp fall in poverty and higher state spending on health and social protection lifted all three components of the index. The dip in 2021 reflects the COVID-19 shock to life expectancy and incomes, which hit Odisha (like all states) hard.
Odisha historically had one of the highest poverty rates in India. By the Planning Commission’s Tendulkar methodology, poverty in Odisha fell from 57.2% in 2004–05 to 32.6% in 2011–12, the steepest fall among major states over that period, though it remained well above the national rate of 21.9%. Rural poverty (35.7% in 2011–12) was far higher than urban poverty (17.3%). No official state-level income poverty estimate has been released since 2011–12.
NITI Aayog’s National Multidimensional Poverty Index measures deprivation across 12 indicators of health (nutrition, child and adolescent mortality, maternal health), education (years of schooling, school attendance) and standard of living (cooking fuel, sanitation, drinking water, electricity, housing, assets, bank account), using National Family Health Survey (NFHS) data.
| Period | Share of Odisha’s population multidimensionally poor | India |
|---|---|---|
| 2005–06 (NFHS-3) | 63.84% | about 55% |
| 2015–16 (NFHS-4) | 29.34% | 24.85% |
| 2019–21 (NFHS-5) | 15.68% | 14.96% |
| 2022–23 (NITI projection) | 11.07% | 11.28% |
Between 2005–06 and 2019–21, over one crore people in Odisha moved out of multidimensional poverty. NITI Aayog named Odisha among the five states with the fastest decline in the share of multidimensionally poor between 2015–16 and 2019–21, alongside Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan.
Poverty is heavily concentrated in the tribal south and south-west. In the MPI baseline (NFHS-4), the highest shares of multidimensionally poor were in Nabarangpur (59.3%), Malkangiri (58.7%) and Koraput (51.1%), while Puri and the coastal districts had the lowest. The largest deprivations statewide were in nutrition, cooking fuel, housing and sanitation.
Health is the dimension in which Odisha has made some of its biggest gains, yet it still lags the national average on several key outcomes.
| Indicator | Odisha | India | Source / year |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 70.3 years | 70.0 years | SRS abridged life tables, 2016–20 |
| Infant mortality rate (per 1,000 live births) | 36 | 28 | SRS 2020 |
| Maternal mortality ratio (per 1,00,000 live births) | 135 | 93 | SRS 2019–21 |
| Total fertility rate | 1.8 | 2.0 | NFHS-5, 2019–21 |
| Institutional births | 92.2% | 88.6% | NFHS-5 |
| Children 12–23 months fully immunised | 90.5% | 76.4% | NFHS-5 |
| Children under 5 stunted | 31.0% | 35.5% | NFHS-5 |
| Children under 5 underweight | 29.7% | 32.1% | NFHS-5 |
| Women 15–49 anaemic | 64.3% | 57.0% | NFHS-5 |
According to Census 2011, Odisha’s literacy rate was 72.87%, close to the national average of 73.0%:
| Census | Total | Male | Female |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1951 | 15.8% | 27.3% | 4.5% |
| 1991 | 49.1% | 63.1% | 34.7% |
| 2001 | 63.1% | 75.4% | 50.5% |
| 2011 | 72.9% | 81.6% | 64.0% |
The male–female gap narrowed from 28 percentage points in 1991 to 18 in 2011. Literacy is highest in the coastal districts — Khordha (86.9%), Jagatsinghpur (86.6%) and Cuttack (85.5%) — and lowest in the tribal south: Nabarangpur (46.4%), Malkangiri (48.5%) and Koraput (49.2%). Female literacy in Malkangiri and Nabarangpur was below 40%. Scheduled Tribe literacy in the state was only 52.2%.
Odisha’s economy has grown faster than India’s for over a decade — real GSDP grew at an average 6.6% a year between 2012–13 and 2021–22, compared with 5.6% nationally (NITI Aayog). Yet per capita income still trails: Odisha’s nominal per capita GSDP was ₹1,46,273 in 2021–22, about 0.85 times India’s ₹1,71,498. Growth has been driven by mining, metals and power, which create relatively few jobs, while about half the workforce remains in agriculture, much of it rain-fed and low-productivity. Large numbers of workers from western and southern Odisha migrate seasonally to brick kilns, construction sites and factories in other states.
Scheduled Tribes form 22.8% and Scheduled Castes 17.1% of Odisha’s population (Census 2011). Odisha has 62 tribal communities, including 13 Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups (PVTGs) such as the Bonda, Dongria Kondh, Juang and Lanjia Saura. ST households lag on almost every human development indicator — literacy, nutrition, maternal health and income — and account for a disproportionate share of the multidimensionally poor.
Odisha’s human development map has a clear coast–interior divide:
| Region | Character | Human development |
|---|---|---|
| Coastal plains (Khordha, Cuttack, Puri, Jagatsinghpur, Kendrapara, Balasore) | Dense population, irrigated agriculture, cities | Highest literacy and HDI, lowest poverty |
| Northern mining–industrial belt (Sundargarh, Jharsuguda, Angul, Keonjhar) | Mines, steel, aluminium, power | High income and HDI in towns, but tribal interiors lag |
| Western Odisha (Sambalpur, Bargarh, Balangir, Nuapada, Kalahandi) | Plateaus, Hirakud command, drought-prone uplands | Mixed; drought and distress migration in Balangir and Nuapada |
| Southern tribal belt (Koraput, Malkangiri, Nabarangpur, Rayagada, Kandhamal, Gajapati) | Eastern Ghats, forests, shifting cultivation | Lowest HDI, highest poverty and malnutrition |
The undivided KBK region — now the eight districts of Koraput, Malkangiri, Nabarangpur, Rayagada, Balangir, Subarnapur, Kalahandi and Nuapada — has long been one of the poorest regions in India. It has received special attention through the Revised Long-Term Action Plan (RLTAP) from 1998–99, the KBK+ scheme and, since 2018, the Aspirational Districts Programme, under which ten Odisha districts (Balangir, Dhenkanal, Gajapati, Kalahandi, Kandhamal, Koraput, Malkangiri, Nabarangpur, Nuapada and Rayagada) are monitored.
In NITI Aayog’s SDG India Index 2023–24, Odisha’s composite score rose to 66 (from 61 in 2020–21), placing it in the Front Runner category for the first time. It was among the top gainers, with a rise of 15 points since 2018.
| Goal | Score | Status |
|---|---|---|
| SDG 6 – Clean water and sanitation | 88 | Front Runner |
| SDG 15 – Life on land | 85 | Front Runner |
| SDG 7 – Affordable and clean energy | 84 | Front Runner |
| SDG 3 – Good health and well-being | 73 | Front Runner |
| SDG 2 – Zero hunger | 45 | Aspirant |
| SDG 4 – Quality education | 40 | Aspirant |
| SDG 5 – Gender equality | 39 | Aspirant |
Odisha has travelled further on human development in the last three decades than almost any other Indian state. A state once synonymous with starvation deaths in Kalahandi and the devastation of the 1999 super cyclone has cut multidimensional poverty by three-quarters, matched the national average on life expectancy and fertility, achieved near-universal immunisation and institutional delivery, and built world-class disaster preparedness. Yet its HDI still sits near the bottom of India’s rankings, held back by high infant and maternal mortality, malnutrition, weak learning outcomes and low incomes. The decisive test for the next decade is the tribal south and drought-prone west: closing the gap between the KBK districts and the coastal plains is the key to Odisha’s human development future.
| Item | Fact |
|---|---|
| HDI (Global Data Lab, 2022) | 0.610 (India 0.644) |
| HDI (Global Data Lab, 2023 release) | 0.648; rank 34 of 36 |
| HDI (Orissa HDR 2004) | 0.579; GDI 0.539 |
| Highest / lowest HDI district (2004) | Khurda 0.736 / Malkangiri 0.370 |
| Multidimensional poverty | 63.84% (2005–06) → 15.68% (2019–21) |
| Life expectancy | 70.3 years (2016–20) |
| IMR | 36 per 1,000 live births (SRS 2020) |
| MMR | 135 per lakh live births (SRS 2019–21) |
| Literacy (2011) | 72.87% (male 81.6%, female 64.0%) |
| Sex ratio (2011) | 979 |
| SDG India Index 2023–24 | 66, Front Runner |
| Per capita GSDP (2021–22) | ₹1,46,273 |